Police department gets traffic-safety grant
Last Modified: Friday, October 30, 2009 at 8:55 a.m.
The Petaluma Police Department received a $200,000 grant this month from the California Office of Traffic Safety that will enable it to purchase new equipment and fund overtime for special traffic-enforcement efforts.
Petaluma police will utilize the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program grant in its efforts to deal with increasing traffic-safety problems and reduce the number of people killed and injured in traffic collisions, said Sgt. Ken Savano.
“The California Office of Traffic Safety continues to support our mission of protecting life and property with continued grant funding, helping our department continue to reduce traffic collisions and preventing deaths and injuries on our streets,” said Chief Dan Fish. “Working together with OTS has allowed our department to provide an effective Traffic Safety Program that has received statewide recognition for the last two years.”
This grant project will target DUI offenders, specifically habitual DUI offenders, and speeding violations, with and emphasis on motorcycle speeding violations, by using laser radar units.
“This will be done through the sobriety checkpoints, warrant service operations, DUI probation and parole checks, stakeouts of habitual DUI offenders and court stings targeting DUI offenders with suspended or revoked licenses who get behind the wheel after leaving court,” Savano said.
“This grant funding comes at a time when speed and DUI violations remain a serious problem in Petaluma,” added Lt. Mike Cook, who oversees the Traffic Safety Program. “Our officers are on pace to break the previous record of 607 DUI arrests made in calendar year 2007 by more than 100 arrests.
“Current estimates are that DUI arrests in the city of Petaluma will peak at almost 700 in calendar year 2009.”
Petaluma police will work with allied agencies to conduct special speed-enforcement operations in and around Petaluma, he added.
The grant also will provide funding for surveillance equipment, laser radar units, checkpoint supplies and overtime to conduct special enforcement activities.
The flurry of recent DUI arrests reflects the need for the funding, Savano said.
Margaret Moudenhauer, 41, of Petaluma was arrested for DUI on Petaluma Boulevard South, near McNear Avenue, at 7:44 p.m. on Saturday after motorists called 911 to report that she was driving under the influence of alcohol. It was her third arrest for the offense, and her blood-alcohol level was more than twice the legal limit of .08 percent.
On Oct. 18, a Petaluma police officer who was returning to the city after booking another DUI driver noticed that Tiffany Parker, 29, of Petaluma was driving a vehicle on southbound Highway 101 that had been recently damaged and had a blown-out tire. The officer stopped Parker at the Pepper Road on-ramp, and found that she was DUI. Parker, like Moudenhauer, was nabbed for the third time for the crime.
The previous night, Henry Flores, 27, of Petaluma drove into two people who were loading groceries from their vehicle in the parking lot of the Greenbriar Apartments, at 200 Greenbriar Circle, and then drove away. He then lost control of the vehicle, and collided with a building in the office complex across the street. He ran off, but later was arrested and booked into Sonoma County Jail for felony DUI and hit and run. His bail was set at $30,000.
While officers were investigating this incident, a 16-year-old youth drove into the complex and collided with a parked vehicle as she tried to go around police cars. She was arrested for DUI after officers found she had a blood-alcohol level more than three times the legal limit.
Also, at about 10:45 p.m. on Oct. 15, Fallon Wilson, 26, of Petaluma was arrested on the 1400 block of East Washington Street after officers found that she was driving with a blood-alcohol level more than twice the legal limit. She also had an outstanding no-bail DUI warrant for her arrest because she had failed to appear in court for her second DUI arrest. Officers also learned that she was on probation due to her DUI arrests.
Petaluma police officers have been conducting random checks on DUI probationers and parolees to be sure that they are complying with their terms and conditions. On Oct. 16, officers checked four of these offenders, abut none of them were found to be in violation, Savano said.
(Contact Dan Johnson at dan.johnson@arguscourier.com)
Next Article in Community-News
-
Police plan to target drivers’ cell-phone use again
After citing 47 drivers for violations, more efforts are planned to address the problem, say police....
search
Local Business Directory
post your stuff
Petaluma360.com is here for you to post your comments, photos, news and events with the community. Post it now!
Your Voice
Have something to say? Join the conversation!
Your Photos
Trying out photography? Show off your stuff here.
Your News Items
Want to report the news? Have an item to share with everyone? Send us your news so we can share it with the community.
Your Events
Submit your area events to encourage others in your community to attend.
Comments
Only moderator-approved comments are shown on this page. To see all comments, please visit the forum.Post a comment | View all comments on this topic.
October 30, 2009 2:09:12 pm
RE: Link
Horay,
mabey we don't need Target afterall!
October 31, 2009 7:27:25 am
Hoo Ray for a Free Dang meal!!! I see California is raising our hard earned tax money 10%.....Can you believe it..
October 31, 2009 12:29:02 pm
Maybe they could help set up a bar program. If your party buys so much in drinks you get a free cab ride coupon good anywhere in Petaluma, you pay extra for service to other towns.
Encourage drinking and dining out with cab rides. "Dinner and a show" how about "drinks and a ride".
October 31, 2009 12:43:19 pm
Everyone wins on this one.
The police get overtime hours.
The city doesn't have to pay them out of the general fund.
The city, county, and state get extra revenues from citation fees.
The insurance companies get more in policy premiums due to increased points on cited drivers' records.
Increased towing and storage fees for towing companies. Or, they get to keep the proceeds from auctioning-off the majority of towed cars that are never claimed.
One or two drunk drivers have their cars towed and they are arrested.
Several unlicensed, uninsured (and usually illegal) drivers lose their cars permanently.
A bonanza for everyone!
Well, almost everyone.
Now, if the monies were spent for increased patrols instead of dragnet checkpoints that inconvenience hundreds of innocent drivers, I would say, "Go for it!"
I still do not understand how these checkpoints are allowed to continue. Drivers are pulled-over with NO probable cause.
"Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Ben Franklin
October 31, 2009 2:57:14 pm
Petaluma Observer - here's a good reason for the checkpoints. Remember, driving is a privilege, not a right. A 26-year-old Geyserville woman driving south on Highway 101 near Healdsburg was killed Friday night when her 2008 Honda Civic was struck by a 1991 Ford Explorer headed north in the southbound lanes, according to the CHP. Crystal Carillo-Martinez was unable to avoid the head-on collision with the Explorer, which was driven by 26-year-old Jose Miguel Botello-Soto of Cloverdale. She died at the scene, officials said. Botello-Soto was taken by ambulance to Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, where he was treated for minor injuries. After receiving medical treatment, Botello-Soto was taken to Sonoma County Jail by CHP personnel where he was booked for gross vehicular manslaughter; felony driving under the influence of alcohol, causing death; felony driving the wrong way on a divided highway, causing death; and driving while unlicensed.
November 1, 2009 8:58:16 am
More from big brother....
November 1, 2009 11:04:59 pm
My objection to the checkpoints is in regards to the lack of probable cause in pulling everyone on the road, dragnet-style, through the checkpoint.
I'll repeat my quote from Benjamin Franklin:
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security."
November 2, 2009 6:19:39 am
My point exactly. It is the overall safety of the public which the same as why for free speech you can't yell fire in theater, or must go through 'dragnet style' checkpoints to get on a plane or have your bags checked going into a sport's event
November 3, 2009 10:38:56 am
Traffic "safety" grant... OH please, you mean traffic "revenue" grant. All this means is more tickets and more money out of hard working taxpayer's pockets. Ho hum same ole same old.
Post a comment | View all comments