87°
Sunny
TUE
 84°
 54°
WED
 84°
 56°
THU
 86°
 56°
FRI
 85°
 57°
SAT
 90°
 57°

Ranchers heated over recall

  • The Rancho Feeding Corp. slaughterhouse on Petaluma Blvd. North in Petaluma sits idle on Monday afternoon February 10, 2014, and has ceased operations after its recall of 8.7 million pounds of meat from 2013.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture remained mostly silent this week about why it conducted a yearlong, 8.7-million pound recall of products distributed from Petaluma slaughterhouse Rancho Feeding Corporation, which the federal agency said were not properly inspected.

Meanwhile, questions continued to plague local ranchers and meat distributors, who claim their recalled meat was not tainted or diseased.

"I don't know how this can happen if there's a meat inspector on site," said Chileno Valley Ranch owner and Petaluma resident Mike Gale. "This comes as a huge surprise. And no one knows what happened. I heard about it in the news — it's this big expose — but we don't know anything. And the silence is hurting the industry. Not just Rancho (Feeding Corp.) or local ranchers, but the whole industry is hurting from this."

Repeated calls and attempts to contact Rancho Feeding Corp. owners Jesse "Babe" Amaral and Robert Singleton were not returned.

Rancho Feeding Corp. was the subject of two U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service recalls this past month. The first occurred on Jan. 13, when federal agents raided the slaughterhouse and recalled 41,683 pounds of beef products reportedly produced on Jan. 8. After further investigation, the USDA expanded its recall to encompass more than a year's worth of beef products that were shipped with the USDA seal of approval to distribution and retail centers in California, Florida, Illinois and Texas. To date, there are no reports of anyone becoming ill after eating the meat.

Since the expanded recall, Rancho Feeding Corp. temporarily closed its door to track down the recalled products and a federal investigation of the slaughterhouse's practices — conducted by the USDA Office of the Inspector General — was announced Tuesday. But other than a vague explanation from the agency's Food Safety and Inspection Service, little is known about the circumstances that led to the massive recall.

According to a USDA spokesperson, Class I recalls such as this are triggered when meat is not properly inspected. Even though USDA press releases related to both recalls referenced "diseased and unsound animals," the USDA representative said Tuesday that the federal agency does not yet know if any animals were diseased.

"We're trying to piece everything together still," said the spokesperson who refused to be named. "Because we know the products went out without the benefit of a full inspection, we're recalling them out of an abundance of caution. But we can't comment on the ongoing inspector general's investigation."

How the meat products were distributed without a full inspection remains unknown. As the North Bay's only USDA-inspected slaughterhouse, by law all meat products must be inspected after the animal is slaughtered. It appears that shouldn't have been difficult to accomplish, since the USDA inspector's office site directly across the parking lot from the Rancho Feeding's main office. The slaughterhouse is reportedly required to have anywhere from one to three inspectors on the premises during all operating hours.

According to federal Food Safety and Inspection Service guidelines, USDA inspectors are responsible for conducting carcass-by-carcass inspections themselves. Slaughterhouse facilities cannot kill animals without FSIS personnel being present and inspections are supposed to take place at the time an animal is brought in and after it is killed. FSIS protocol states that no carcasses are allowed to enter the food supply until inspected and approved by the FSIS inspection personnel. So why a year's worth of meat products were released into the food supply without the full federal inspection has yet to be explained by the USDA.


comments powered by Disqus
© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View