Statewide measure requiring more room for egg-laying hens passed overwhelmingly, but local ranchers believe it could force them from business

?It?s probably going to mean the end of an era in Petaluma,? said Steve Mahrt of Petaluma Farms, an opponent of Proposition 2, which passed with 63 percent support on Nov. 4.

The measure requires most chickens, pigs and veal calves in California to have enough room to turn around freely, lie down, stand up and extend their limbs. The provisions don?t take effect until 2015.

But Mahrt and others in the egg industry said requiring more space per chicken means fewer eggs can be produced, raising the cost of doing business.

They argue that the language of the proposition is unclear, with no specific standards for how chickens must be contained.

?Nobody really knows what it means,? said Arnold Riebli, whose Sunrise Farms operation produces a million eggs a year.

?If the outcome is ?only cage-free,? we?re going out,? Riebli said.

He estimates it would take him $15-$20 million to convert to larger cages and twice that to change to a cage-free operation.

Mahrt, who produces organic eggs, said even his cage-free operation may be affected, if the state requires a certain amount of space per pen based on the number of chickens inside.

His ranch faces up to a two-thirds cut in production, Mahrt said.

However, Prop. 2 supporters, including the Humane Society of the United States, dispute that current cage-free operations would be affected.

© The Press Democrat |  Terms of Service |  Privacy Policy |  Jobs With Us |  RSS |  Advertising |  Sonoma Media Investments |  Place an Ad
Switch to our Mobile View