A housing development on the western outskirts of town that was first proposed eight years ago but was delayed during the recession is moving forward again with the recent release of the draft Environmental Impact Report.
The move is drawing renewed scrutiny from a neighborhood group that is raising concerns over the environmental impacts to the land and the number of homes planned for the project.
The site in question is 58 acres of former ranchland, once known as Scott Ranch, near Helen Putnam Park at D Street and Windsor Drive.
The housing developer, Davidon Homes of Walnut Creek, first proposed the project in 2004 as a 93-home development. At the time, a group called Petalumans for Responsible Planning (PetRP), sprang up, citing concerns over the environmental impact to the land, impacts on nearby homes, the preservation of historic red barns on the site, and the density of homes proposed.
They also advocated that the "maximum acreage" possible on the site be devoted to open space rather than housing development, specifically asking that some or all of the land be dedicated to expanding the adjacent Helen Putnam Regional Park.
The project has not progressed over the last several years, which Davidon's Vice President of Land Acquisition Jeff Thayer attributed in a previous interview to a combination of factors, including waiting for the city to complete its long term water plan and the recession. But, he said, the project is now "back on track."
The EIR, released on Feb. 14, outlines the originally proposed, 93-home version of the project, which would include about 20 acres of private open space and a park, as well as a trail running along Kelly Creek and leading to Helen Putnam Regional Park. Lot sizes would range from .3 to 1.1 acres. The draft EIR also lays out four alternative projects — one with 66 homes, one with 47, one with 28 and another with no building at all.
When asked how seriously the company was considering any of those alternatives, Thayer said the 66-home alternative was one that his company believes "would achieve positive objectives" and could support.
He added that, since the project was last on the table, his company has met with agencies like the Department of Fish and Game and local neighborhood groups to determine what would be acceptable at the site, especially given the need to preserve habitat for the endangered red-legged frog. The 66-home alternative seems to work well when taking the biological restrictions into consideration, he said.
But Greg Colvin of PetRP says that an even lower-density project than the 66-homes option may be needed. He cited a survey that PetRP conducted in the fall, where 48 percent of 186 respondents indicated that they would want to see no more than 41 homes on the property. Another 47 percent didn't want to see any homes on the site.