Despite rebounding tax revenues, Petaluma is facing a major spike in its annual pension payments — meaning that the city's new funds will likely be used to pay employee retirement costs rather than restoring public services like streets and parks maintenance.
"It will most likely mean that the (financial) bump the city was anticipating from the Target and Friedman's shopping centers will largely get chewed up by retirement and rising employee healthcare costs," said Councilmember Mike Healy. "We realistically don't have the ability to bring back city services."
Petaluma, like many other jurisdictions across the state, is not alone in this predicament. Many cities are now facing the ramifications of generous salaries and retirement packages given to public employees in the 2000s, after Gov. Gray Davis and state legislators passed a bill that gave state workers dramatic benefit and salary increases in 1999. The compensation hikes at the state level, primarily in response to a sharp increase in tax revenues that stemmed from a time of economic growth and expansion, forced local jurisdictions to follow suit in order to remain competitive in the job market.
When the economy sputtered and investments didn't perform, the California Employee Pension Retirement System — the state's largest public pension system covering Petaluma's law enforcement, fire and city employees — found itself unable to keep up with the funds needed to one day pay the retirement plans for all its members. The resulting gap is known as unfunded liability. While carrying an unfunded liability is typical for most employers, CalPERS' underfunded portion has skyrocketed to more than $87 billion, forcing its members to pay more and more into the system, instead of relying on investments, assets, and savings to weather the financial storm.
Petaluma, and most other jurisdictions throughout the system, has been forced to increase its payments to CalPERS to keep up with its portion of unfunded liability. But a recent decision by the CalPERS board to bill cities substantially more each year in an effort to fully fund the system means that Petaluma will be forced to dedicate even larger portions of its general fund budget to pension costs in the near future.
With the recently approved increases set to take effect in 2015, Petaluma is projecting a General Fund budget deficit of approximately $2.3 million by 2017. According to Petaluma Finance Director Bill Mushallo, the City of Petaluma could see a 10 percent increase in its yearly bill from CalPERS in 2015, and face additional annual increases for several subsequent years.
"Starting in fiscal year 2015, Petaluma could be looking at a $700,000 increase in its CalPERS payments," said Mushallo, who also estimated that the pension bill for 2016 could jump by another $900,000. That's on top of the already forecasted hikes the city plans on seeing each year, Mushallo said.
Over the past decade, Petaluma has seen its CalPERS bill more than double from about $2.9 million in 2003, to more than $6.1 million in 2013. That means that the city's pension obligations have risen from 5.8 percent of the city's annual general fund budget ten years ago, to 17.5 percent this year.
While many have applauded CalPERS' efforts to become more financially stable, most agree that the financial impacts for cities will be significant. "The good news is that this isn't happening until 2015," said Mushallo. "But we are going to have to look at alternatives to cover the costs as we get closer."