s
s
Sections
Sections
Subscribe
You've read 5 of 15 free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read 10 of 15 free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
You've read all of your free articles this month.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting at 99 cents per month.
Already a subscriber?
We've got a special deal for readers like you.
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting 99 cents per month and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?
Thanks for reading! Why not subscribe?
Get unlimited access to PressDemocrat.com, the eEdition and our mobile app starting 99 cents per month and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?
Want to keep reading? Subscribe today!
Ooops! You're out of free articles. Starting at just 99 cents per month, you can keep reading all of our products and support local journalism.
Already a subscriber?

After Councilmember Mike Healy announced Monday that a poll he commissioned showed almost 70 percent of city voters would support a half-cent sales tax increase for eight years to fund general services, community members and Mayor David Glass challenged the validity of the poll results and the effects an additional tax would have on other November ballot taxes.

Healy said that a professional polling firm performed the poll, but would not disclose which firm. He said the Petaluma Lodging Coalition and the Petaluma Police Officers Association covered the $2,000 survey cost jointly. While typical professional polls usually consist of live polltakers conducting 20 to 30 minute interviews with subjects and cost closer to $20,000, the poll Healy conducted is called a "Robocall" poll and features a two-minute automated message complete with touchtone responses.

Healy said that because there is almost no paid labor involved, it shrinks the cost of the survey dramatically and allows for a much larger sample size.

"Typically, you get 400 responses to polls with a 4.9 percent margin of error," he said. "We placed 20,000 calls and got 1,216 responses, which shrinks the margin of error to 2.2 percent."

But local media consultant and former Councilmember Brian Sobel said that while he has no knowledge of Healy's particular poll, "Robocall" polls are generally considered the least reliable scientific polls available.

"The rule of thumb is the longer the poll, the more accurate the results," he said. "The accuracy of the poll is really based on the quality of the questions and whether the respondents are who you think they are and not someone else in the target's household answering the phone."

Sobel added that the size of the sample polled does little to affect the accuracy of a poll and that just because someone is able to poll a large sample size doesn't mean that the results are as accurate as they could be.

"The poll's accuracy isn't based on whether you get a response," he said. "It's just hard to say that a poll with one or two questions is effective because you haven't taken the time to build the arguments for and against it to the voter being polled."

Healy said the automated poll conducted this week informed participants that local officials are considering a sales tax measure for the November ballot to help maintain essential city services, such as police and fire protection, drug and gang-crime prevention, school resource officer restoration, street repair and stormwater maintenance.

It then asked voters how supportive they would be of a half-cent sales tax increase for eight years, with all revenue staying in the city to be used at the city's discretion. Those polled could say they were very supportive, somewhat supportive, not very supportive or not supportive at all. Healy said 47 percent of participants responded as very supportive, 21 percent said somewhat supportive, 11 percent said not very supportive and 17 percent were not supportive at all. 5 percent had no opinion in the matter.

Healy said he stands by the "Robocall" polling results and pointed out that he commissioned a similar poll to determine that most Petalumans opposed the Rohnert Park casino. He did not disclose the name of the firm used in that poll either.

He added that the poll's language was kept short to encourage more participation in the survey. "You can make the questions longer if you want, but it can discourage a lot of people from wanting to participate," he said.

At Monday's meeting, Mayor David Glass questioned the language of the poll questions, wondering why participants weren't asked how they would vote on the proposed sales tax when they are already being asked to consider a state tax and a parcel tax to fund parks and recreation projects as well.

"I'm afraid that too many taxes on the ballot will take all the taxes down," Glass said. "I'm not saying that the city doesn't need the money or that I'm against the tax. I just want more comprehensive polling done."

Councilmember Gabe Kearney echoed Glass' worry about too many taxes on the November ballot causing all the tax measures to fail. He pointed out that the results of Healy's poll show that Petalumans are open to tax increases, but questioned how many.

"For what was spent on the poll, we were able to get a good idea on whether people supported a tax at all, " Kearney said. "The question is, do we think it would pass with all the other taxes on the ballot or should we wait until next year?"

Healy said that people always worry about bombarding voters with too many taxes at once, but pointed out that Santa Rosa voters faced multiple tax measures a few years ago — the county's Measure M for transportation and roads and the city's Measure O for police, fire and gang prevention programs — and passed them both.

"I think we have well-educated voters and they understand that these measures would be supporting different things and they will vote accordingly," he said.

The councilmembers plan to do more community surveying and revisit the issue at the July 16 meeting. The city has until Aug. 10 to place a tax measure on the November ballot.

(Contact Janelle Wetzstein at janelle.wetzstein@arguscourier.com)