Quake insurance too costly for most
After Sonoma County residents woke up to the earth shaking in the early morning of Aug. 24, a few considered taking another look at earthquake insurance.
“We had three or four calls after the Napa Quake,” said Petaluma insurance broker Larry Tencer. “I wrote one new policy.”
Such a modest response to a potentially devastating event must have its reasons, and as with most things, it often comes down to money: Earthquake insurance is expensive, and the deductibles are high.
Still, yet another reason to consider earthquake insurance came last week, when the U.S. Geological Survey released a study warning that the Rodgers Creek Fault, which runs north-south through Sonoma County just a few miles east of Petaluma, has accumulated enough energy to produce a devastating 7.1-magnitude earthquake at any time.
The study, co-authored with San Francisco State University researchers, concludes that the fault is “locked” — meaning pent-up energy is unable to escape — and has not seen a major incident since 1969.
It’s not just after such reminders that people look into getting earthquake insurance. Insurance companies are required by law to inform new homeowners that their regular homeowner policy does not cover earthquakes, and that earthquake insurance is available.
That requirement was put into effect 30 years ago, in 1984, to settle the legal confusion among insurers about whether or not a regular homeowner policy covered earthquakes. For a decade thereafter, insurance earthquake coverage was “a very rich policy, and very inexpensive,” in Glenn Pomeroy’s words. “It was a bad day in January when that all changed” — Jan. 17, 1994, when a 6.7-magnitude quake shook Northridge, California, in the San Fernando Valley.
Since 2008, Pomeroy has been CEO of the California Earthquake Authority, the state’s publicly managed, privately funded “risk-bearing entity” for earthquake insurance. It’s the only such agency in the country, created in the wake of that bad day in January. The Northridge earthquake caused $40 billion in property damage, half of that to residential property, and half of that again — $10 billion — to homes covered by earthquake insurance.
“It was far beyond what they ever projected, and wiped out all the premiums that had been collected,” said Pomeroy. “It changed the landscape.”
The insurance companies asked the state Legislature to relieve them of the obligation to provide, even as an option, earthquake coverage. The legislature refused to do so, but a compromise was reached creating a risk-bearing body to lift the weight of earthquake coverage from the insurance companies. That became the California Earthquake Authority (CEA) in 1996, stable enough to take care of the devastation from a once-every-450-years earthquake event for those who are insured.
Presently, the CEA handles about three-fourths of all homes covered by earthquake insurance in California, through a constellation of member insurance companies such as Liberty Mutual, AAA, Allstate, State Farm and many others. The other 25 percent are covered by non-member insurance companies, usually the larger insurance corporations such as Hartford, Fireman’s Fund or Travelers.
But only about 10 percent of homes in the state are covered by earthquake insurance at all, and in some areas it’s even lower. The reasons are straightforward, according to Larry Tencer: “Cost, and the high deductible.” Tencer, who has been an insurance broker in Petaluma since 1976, estimates that between 8 and 10 percent of his residential policies have earthquake coverage. For most, though, it’s a hard expenditure to justify.