Hands off marine sanctuaries, top Democrats and drilling foes tell Trump
SAUSALITO - Top Democratic Party leaders, environmentalists and fishermen Wednesday gathered here in a show of united opposition to President Donald Trump’s order to review and potentially open up federal marine sanctuaries off the California coast to new oil and gas drilling.
Legislators, including House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco, Reps. Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, and Rep. Jackie Speier, D-San Mateo, urged staunch resistance to any rollback of protections off the coast, which they said would threaten fisheries, recreation and tourism industries.
“This president wants to keep monuments to Confederate leaders and their rebellion against the United States, but he wants to shut down public national monuments that protect uniquely American landscapes and oceans for future generations,” Huffman said in front a of a standing-room only crowd at the Bay Model visitor’s center.
President Trump in April ordered a review of the expansions to 11 sanctuaries and monuments, including four that surround the Channel Islands and cover the California coast from San Luis Obispo County to Point Arena in Mendocino County, shielding ?12,300 square -miles from oil drilling and other energy extraction.
Pelosi called the marine sanctuaries, created through legislation and executive orders stretching back decades, an “irreplaceable treasure,” and equated their defense to a moral and practical stand against Trump’s “America First” offshore energy policy. It calls for greater U.S. fossil fuel production through wider leasing of marine drilling tracts, a move Trump pledged would create thousands of high-paying jobs and make the nation more secure.
Pelosi assailed the policy as a “reckless drilling agenda,” touting clean oceans as “the lifeblood of the planet.”
Whether Trump administration listens or not, she said “we want to make sure the American people hear your message through the members of Congress.”
Meanwhile, the Department of Interior faces a deadline today to announce a decision on whether to downsize or eliminate 27 other national monuments - including Berryessa Snow Mountain, which covers?covering parts of Napa, Mendocino and Lake counties.
Conservation, tribal and outdoor recreation groups have fought against any rollback of protections, but some proponents for shrinking or undoing the national monuments say past presidents have misused a century-old law to create preserves that are too large, forestalling energy development, grazing, mining and other uses.
In addition to sanctuaries and coastal monuments under review off California, other affected marine areas stretch from the Atlantic Coast to the Great Lakes, Hawaii and Samoa.
Trump’s order established a national policy to “encourage energy exploration and production” in offshore waters “to maintain the nation’s position as a global energy leader.”
Speakers at Wednesday’s forum said even if California’s offshore oil reserves are exploited it would not affect the cost of a gallon of gasoline at the pump.
The Department of Commerce has received more than 100,000 comments on the president’s order. Public support for marine sanctuaries and monuments was nearly unanimous in a recent sampling of letters submitted to the federal government, according to a review by an ocean conservation group.
More than 99 percent of the people who submitted comments on Trump’s order advocated leaving the sanctuaries in place, the Marine Conservation Institute said.
The four California sanctuaries protect places such as the Monterey Canyon, Farallon Islands and Cordell Bank, a biologically rich sea mount off the Marin coast.
Huffman said there should have been hearings in Congress to allow for even more public comment on Trump’s order.
“We’re taking matters into our hands today so that the people - you the owners of public lands and oceans - can actually be heard,” Huffman told the audience in a building facing San Francisco Bay, where kayakers paddled and anchored boats bobbed with the tide.
Speakers warned of the potential for devastating spills if coastal sanctuaries are opened to oil and gas drilling, and the impact it would have on outdoor recreation, marine mammals and fish.
“We are really fighting for the California way of life,” Speier said. “We won’t sit down and let everyone roll over us.”
State Sen. Mike McGuire, D-Healdsburg, chairman of a state joint committee on fisheries and aquaculture, said the $44 billion coastal economy, driven partly by tourism and fishing, is one of California’s largest economic drivers, with 500,000 jobs dependent upon it.
“Make no mistake. California will fight from the halls of Congress, to the halls of our state Capitol, to the courts … to block any short-sighted proposal that sells off the Pacific Coast,” McGuire said to strong applause from the audience.
Former Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey, D-Petaluma, described legislative efforts stretching back to the early 1980s to create the marine sanctuaries.
“The entire community totally favored protection of the Sonoma Coast,” she said adding that there was tepid opposition from the oil and gas industry.
Huffman said said noted the oil industry is mostly likely to favor new drilling off the Channel Islands near Santa Barbara, where rigs already exist.
“They want to keep the door open up here - clearly - or they would not have opposed the sanctuary expansion,” he said in an interview.